Father’s Day ad Ban Proves Marriage and Parenting are Intrinsically Linked

All this time Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Advocates have been telling us that marriage has nothing to do with family or parenting. They almost had many well-meaning Australians fooled. But it all unravelled for them this week, when a heart-warming TV Commercial celebrating Father’s Day was banned from FreeTV.

In case there was any doubt as to the link between parenting and same-sex marriage, FreeTV’s Lawyers confirmed it: “in light of the same-sex marriage plebiscite…comment upon a matter which is currently the subject of extensive political debate”.

“Political matter is defined as ‘any matter that appears to comment on, encourage participation in or attempt to influence a certain outcome within a political process’."

FreeTV has been playing similar community service announcements from not-for-profit organisation Dads4Kids for years, but in light of the upcoming marriage vote, the ads celebrating Father’s Day are now considered ‘political’ in nature because fatherhood, motherhood and marriage are intrinsically linked. It’s about time we were allowed to say that out loud!

“These television commercials are simply a gentle encouragement to Australian dads, and an affirmation that they are an important figure in the lives of their children,” spokesman Ben Pratt said.

“This Father’s Day ad has been stopped from airing on TV because it’s too ‘political. It’s a scary world where the role of a father can be outlawed. What next?” Liberal MP Michael Sukkar.

Share Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube

14 Responses

    • In response to Bob Roberts:
      FreeTV is trying to “have their cake and eat it too” – Dads4kids has been producing a “Fathers and kids” commercial each year since 2012, so it is disingenuous for FreeTV to say that it is political because of what is on Dads4kids website. Are they going to request Qantas put political tags on their ads now, as they vehemently support the ‘Yes’ point-of-view’? Whichever way you cut it – FreeTV’s action is *UNQUESTIONABLY* a confirmation that they are stating there is a link between fatherhood and SSM.

      • Rubbish, Eddie Ventley. The ad wasn’t banned. The producers didn’t want to add authorizing material to the ad. It IS a political ad, else what is it selling?

        Reading these comments make me slightly ill that there are so many people hyperventilating about this.

        • Michael

          Rubbish, Zeke.
          If a TV station refused to broadcast the ad, then obviously, the ad been banned. Why should the producers add political authorisation, when Father’s Day is not a political event? The ad isn’t selling anything; certainly not fatherhood, because unlike gay men, natural fathers don’t need to buy their children.

          Reading your comment made me slightly ill, that you were hyperventilating about this.

  1. Cursed be the day when I was born; Let the day not be blessed when my mother bore me!
    Cursed be the man who brought the news To my father, saying, “A baby boy has been born to you!” And made him very happy
    But let that man be like the cities Which the LORD overthrew without relenting, And let him hear an outcry in the morning And a shout of alarm at noon;
    Because he did not kill me before birth, So that my mother would have been my grave, And her womb ever pregnant.
    Why did I ever come forth from the womb To look on trouble and sorrow, So that my days have been spent in shame? [JEREMIAH Chapter 20 : 14 – 18]
    Now, I know he was not referring to same sex marriage because this is a recent trend. At that time the popular trend was worshipping and sacrificing to idols.
    Nevertheless… How sad for someone to feel that way. SSM won’t solve that feeling among the general population in our society, nor in the children of all dysfunctional parents, and especially not in those whose natural parents are denied them.
    SSm will only make two people feel self important…. Just another fad, an ego trip.

  2. Michael

    From the article:–

    fatherhood, motherhood and marriage are intrinsically linked…

    Maybe Australians shouldn’t be surprised about the “Father’s Day ad ban”. Many Aussies think of having children as a lifestyle choice, rather than accepting parenthood as a natural result of being married.

    Some Aussie men think manhood consists in pursuing underground tree branches. Often, a man isn’t man enough to accept the result of his actions, deserting the child he fathers, through neglect or abortion. And a woman doesn’t want the abusive/exploitative man who fathered her children, to be her children’s father.

    Parents should teach their children that sexual intercourse is best left for a life-long, faithful one-flesh union of a man and a woman, as only this can provide sexual health and fulfilment, free from guilt, fear and disease. The best sex on earth was made by heaven. Plus, it doesn’t cost taxpayers a single cent.

    Natural families celebrate Mother’s Day and Father’s Day. Married couples don’t need public celebrations of their sexuality, because they can celebrate the result of their sexuality, their children. The LGBTIQ demand for public approval via “gay pride” shows that sodomy can never satisfy the natural human desire for sexual fulfilment and fruitfulness.

    Having children together deepens and enriches a married couple’s love and commitment. Natural sex makes a natural family; plastic sex makes a paper family. Man and woman have consummation; two the same have empty frustration.

    • Michael,

      I agree with your comments. I am extremely concerned about Australian governments (Federal, State and Local) as they’re all attempting to falsify the Bible and the law on “one flesh” marriage. There have been millions of people over the centuries and all around the world who have sworn on the Bible, and it is a historical book based on the truth, and the Bible would have never been accepted into any court around the world if it was considered a fairytale like Goldilocks and the three bears. The Bible is a book about marriage from the beginning to the end, and it is a marriage of difference not sameness. The Bible is clear that marriage has only ever existed from the beginning with Adam and Eve (between a man and a woman) being united together as “one flesh” for the purpose of naturally procreating, nurturing and raising new-life. The 10 Commandments are clear that God commanded children are to honour their father and mother so it is obvious the God never intended for children to be legally separated from their father or mother. God warned about the harm of coveting another man’s wife which leads to adultery-divorce. The British Laws incorporated the 10 Commandments and currently the British Marriage Law requires man-woman married couples must consummate their marriage in order for it to be considered a genuine marriage which can’t be annulled by the church/state, and adultery is grounds for divorce.

      Australia inherited our laws from the British Laws. The NSW Marriage Registry website has recorded the history of marriages in NSW as marriages were only recorded in the Christian churches from 1788-1856, and there were no same-sex marriages recorded as same-sex partners can’t consummate a marriage. The Christian churches were always conducting legitimate marriages in Australia because the history of marriage in 1563 the Council of Trent first decreed that marriages should be celebrated in the presence of a priest and at least two witnesses. This is when what we know as marriage first became codified by the Church. The Australian parliament never changed this religious practice of marriage but from 1857 forced the Christian ministers to register all marriages in NSW in the NSW Marriage Registry in order to keep accurate records for the illegitimacy of children and inheritance. Therefore, the civil “registered marriage” practice in Australia was established in order to regulate the harm of adultery, separation/divorce, and death including suicide as breakdown of marriages and families are a massive cost for government, society and children suffer the most.

      The no fault divorce was introduced in 1975 which made adultery irrelevant but it allowed abused wives and children an easier access to divorce/separation from their husband/father. The current Australian government believes it can include the marital act of legal sodomy for all civil “registered marriages,” but this idea totally deregulates the civil “registered marriage” practice as it goes totally against the natural behavioural practice of a “one flesh” marriage and husband-wife-children with the harm of coveting-adultery-divorce. The Australian governments are undermining the conscience and morality of Australians by changing civil laws which directly impact on religious laws (morality) in the Bible and this is a major reason to separate these practices like legal prostitution which registers and regulates sex workers. Christians can’t change the Bible to accomodate people’s feelings, desires, lusts and passion for same-sex marriage. The Australian governments treats the Bible like a fantasy story so they’ll have us all in court swearing on Goldilocks and the three bears if we don’t stop this madness. The courts will have me recorded as a male witness because my mum has always told me that I’m just like my father so this makes me a man and the Australian government authorities can’t discriminate the difference between a male and female. What is perjury when nobody understands what truth means let alone the difference between objective and subjective truth. The Bible clearly defines and regulates “one flesh” marriage, coveting-adultery-divorce so I don’t need any society approval from the Thugs of Melbourne nor the LGBTIAQ party dictators. The Australian governments will have everyone believing that my cat and dog registration with my local council is a legal marriage certificate and all I need to do is have our legal unions blessed in a wedding ceremony. I guess when people start falsifying legal documents and historical records then our society is in a real mess with delusional fantasies.

      • Michael

        I share your concerns. All levels of Australian governments are trying to change historical records, the meaning of words, and the plain truth things. The Hobart City Council is flying the LGBTIQ “rainbow flag” on its office building “until marriage equality becomes law”. It’s not a coincidence this Council is leading the push to change the date of Australia Day. Lord Mayor Sue Hickey pushed for the LGBTIQ flag, and dismissed the majority of other councils opposing the Australia day change as “pale, male and stale”, despite the fact that my local council has been temporarily replaced with a female commissioner who voted against this change. Alderman Hickey cannot see that it’s really “same-sex marriage” of two men that’s a “pale, male and stale” imitation of the real thing.

        The “Thugs of Melbourne” reach across Bass Strait, as if we don’t have enough of our own over here. My local Tasmanian newspaper refused to print my letter about “same-sex marriage”, after consultation with a senior editor in the Victorian Country Press Association, based in Bairnsdale, of which it is a member. Locals are very surprised to learn that what they read in a community newspaper has to be cleared by Victorians ❗ There is another local paper which boasts it has no such affiliations, and which, according to its website, prints articles “to stimulate debate in the local community”. They won’t print any letters from me, on any subject. When I telephoned to politely ask why this might be, they became very aggressive and belligerent. “Why should we print them?” I replied, “I don’t expect you to print all of them, but you don’t print any of them”. After telling me black’s white and pink’s purple, they hung up on me. Don’t they realise, if they treat readers like that, they won’t have a paper?

        I too could pass myself off as trasgender; due to circs I have done more washing, ironing, cleaning, cooking meals than most men do if they live to be 100 — more than quite few women too. Besides, I work as a volunteer in a female-dominated occupation. I also have a letter from Deloitte addressed to Ms Michael Smith. In February 2016, Tasmania’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner proposed a new law which would let people change (falsify) their birth certificates to a different sex, just like that.

        The commandment to honour your father and your mother is another example of Scripture being an inexhaustible mine of wonderful riches. When a genuine couples consummates their marriage, open to the procreation of new life, this too honours their mothers and fathers by continuing the processes of life and family that began with Adam and Eve. The fact of having a mother and father is literally written in every cell of your body, except in the cells your body produces to allow you to become a mother or father as the case may be. When the sperm and egg unite, they cease to be what they were, joining as the “one flesh” of a new life.

        The act of consummation symbolises the self-sacrifice of married life, because you completely give yourself to your spouse, losing the defining feature of your own body by uniting it with your spouse’s. Recalling the garden of Eden, the man goes into the woman who was taken out of him, while the woman takes in the man from whom she was taken. It is in giving that spouses receive. Married love is an adult love of self-sacrifice. LGBTIQ love is a juvenile lust of self-gratification.

        • Michael,

          Thanks for your comments. Psalm 51 – When the prophet Nathan came to King David after he had committed adultery with Bathsheba. This Psalm highlighted the depth of sin which the act of adultery caused King David, and he pleaded with God to have mercy on him and “create in me (him) a pure heart.” Australian society wants to make light of sin so it won’t be long before people change the word “stealing” to become borrowing with no return and the word “murder” will become “assisted dying” because we are all dying and a person who decides to kill is only assisting the dying process to death. Australian laws will become meaningless without the truth such as the case where a young man in Sydney was buried by his boyfriend who claimed he loved him and claimed it was a drug overdose. The court had found the boyfriend wasn’t guilty of murder but the boyfriend didn’t tell the court he knew where he had buried the young man and he kept this a secret for many years. The parents of the young man pleaded with his boyfriend to tell police where he had buried their son. The Australian courts will find it harder to get objective truth out of people when they can mislead the court with subjective truth or a delusional fantasy. It is a great shame that your local newspapers won’t print your articles about same-sex marriage as this is an oxymoron which doesn’t make sense like the “bachelor-married man.”

          • Michael

            Thanks for your reply. Perhaps Jesus had in mind Psalm 51 when he said that fornication, adultery and murder proceed from the heart. David compounded his adultery by effectively murdering Bathsheba’s husband, Uriah the Hittite, by making sure he was killed in battle. As Nathan told him, you have killed Uriah with the sword of the Ammonites. But this was only plan B to cover his adultery, as he had first brought Uriah back from the front, and tried to get him drunk so he’d go home get friendly with his wife, but Uriah’s sense of duty wouldn’t let him do that, so he slept in the courtyard with David’s guards.

            I’m glad you brought this up, as last Friday’s Mercury had an article from former Catholic priest turned LGBTIQ activist Julian Punch, who was trying to make David and Jonathan into gay lovers, but this is clearly refuted by David’s adultery with Bathsheba, a woman he spied bathing herself. I wrote to the Mercury about this; hope they print it, as I haven’t had a letter in there for a while. Mr Punch quotes David saying of Jonathan, “your love for me was more wonderful than that of women”, conveniently omitting David’s preceding words “Jonathan my brother”. This quotation is from David’s lament after Saul and three of his sons, including Jonathan, were killed by the Philistines; incidently, this is where the phrase “how the mighty have fallen” comes from. David and Jonathan were brothers-in-law, with Jonathan proving a better friend than his sister Michal, David’s wife, who came to “despise David in her heart” (1 Samuel 6:16). Earlier, David and Jonathan swore an oath of friendship between themselves and their descendants forever. David and Jonathan clearly weren’t a same-sex couple, as two men cannot produce descendants together. I’m surprised Mr Punch didn’t try to make a gay incident out of Judas kissing Jesus in betrayal.

            It’s hard enough to get at the true truth in court cases anyway, even without the false witness of a man who dresses up as a woman being recorded “a female”. In Tasmania, Sue Neil-Fraser is 8 years into a 23-year sentence for murdering her husband, but no body was ever found, and various appeals continue.

            Marriage is a union of two complimentary opposites, forming a self-sufficient whole. “Same-sex marriage” is a contradiction in terms, like the living corpse of an antarctic aboriginal pregnant man, reversing forwards on a two-wheeled tricycle, while flying underwater through a colossally tiny, solid hollow square triangle of limited infinity.

        • Michael,

          Thanks for your comment. I have also heard people claiming King David’s love for Jonathan’s is an example of homosexuality and they also never mentioned King David’s adulterous relationship with Bathsheba. I am glad you’re going to raise this issue with your local paper as the truth should be reported on this matter.

        • Thugs? I’m old enough to remember the “poofter bashings” that occurred during my youth, and the police who ignored the victims and exonerated the perpetrators. How many victims died of shame?

          You people should be ashamed of yourselves, especially your ridiculous and irrational claims that your male/female relationships are “real love” and homosexual ones are not.

          You obviously only believe in equality for straight people and that homosexual people are incapable of love and inferior to yourself. Be ashamed.

          • Michael

            No-one is condoning violence against gays, nor police cover-ups. You ask, how many victims of “poofter bashings” died of shame? How many more gays die of sexually transmitted diseases and other entirely preventable physical and mental health problems? These deaths are caused by their own voluntary sexual behaviour and lifestyle choices, not by the attitudes or actions of others.

            How many “poofter bashings” are actually done by gay men? Gay Australians aren’t at risk of violence from Christians, but from their fellow gays. According to LGBTIQA+ activists David Island and Patrick Letellier in Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them:–

            The probability of violence occurring in a gay couple is mathematically double the probability of that in a heterosexual couple.

            You should be ashamed of yourself, especially your ridiculous and irrational claims that your male/male and female/female relationships are “real love” and equivalent to the natural, life-long, one-flesh marriage of a man and a woman, based on natural sexual intercourse, able to procreate new life. A one-flesh marriage is the only sexual relationship in which it is impossible to contract a sexually transmitted disease. Any children naturally born into this relationship grow up knowing their biological parents, having them both as male and female role models, and as a model of both sexes working together for a common purpose. A man and a woman don’t need to register their one-flesh marriage with the government, because it exists independently; unlike the legal fiction of “2 people” marriage, which can’t exist without a civil marriage registration.

            If “love is love”, parliament can’t give “marriage equality” to some “2 people” lawful sexual relationships, while denying it to others. The Human Rights (Sexual Conduct) Act 1994 gives equal protection from discrimination and government interference to all sexual relationships between consenting adults, including:–

            ➡ Adultery,
            ➡ Consensual adult incest,
            ➡ Short-term “cuffing marriages”, and
            ➡ “Harlot marriage” of sex worker and client.

            You should be ashamed of yourself, especially your ridiculous and irrational claims that your male/male and female/female relationships are “real love” and harlot ones are not.

            You obviously only believe in equality for gay people and that harlot people are incapable of love and inferior to yourself. Be ashamed.

          • Michael

            As you’re so concerned about violence against gays, why don’t you “come out” against the extreme violence of abortion? If people are “born gay”, then ripping the arms and legs off unborn gay babies without anaesthetic while they’re still alive, must constitute the most extreme homophobic violence ever. (This is what happens in a “dilation and evacuation” abortion, which is a totally legal medical procedure.) When Tasmanian LGBTIQA+ activists marched into the Hobart police station in the 1990s, with the media in tow, they were happy to risk 21 years in prison for “gross indeceny” and “unnatural sexual intercourse”. But they will not risk just one year in prison, under Tasmania’s Repoductive Health (Access to Terminations) Act 2013, to try to save the lives of babies whom they claim are “born gay”.

Leave a comment