Our Freedoms Are Already Under Attack

SSM Advocates continue to claim that ‘nothing will change’ if marriage is redefined to allow same-sex/transgender couples to ‘marry.’

But what we’ve seen over the last couple of weeks, is that the freedoms of regular Australians are being stripped away by aggressive activists.

In case you’re wondering how freedoms ARE AND WILL BE affected by redefining marriage, here are a few examples just from the last week!

We watched in horror as Catholic students were physically attacked and vilified at a University campus:

We saw ‘Yes’ Activists destroy ‘No’ posters outside a ‘No’ event on the weekend…

A children’s entertainer was fired for adding the ‘It’s okay to vote no’ overlay to her facebook profile picture and she was labelled a ‘homophobe’ by her former employer: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/~/article-4894122/index.html

We watched a young gay man being called a ‘homophobe’ and heckled as he explained why he’s voting no:

A Brisbane church received abuse, onsite protests, a sign was defaced and their Facebook page was inundated with hate speech and 1 Star reviews for sharing the Biblical view of marriage: Full story here

And a skywriter has been overwhelmed by abuse and threats for writing ‘Vote No’ across the skies of Sydney on Sunday morning: Full story here

Perhaps the most shocking example of bullying and the impact of same-sex/transgender marriage on education came last week. Politician Fiona Scott revealed on Paul Murray Live this week that a year 1 child (that’s 5-7yrs old!) came home from school and asked his parents how they were voting in the SSM postal survey. When they said they would be voting no, he called them ‘bigots!’ When asked where he had learnt that word, he innocently revealed that his teacher had told the whole class that anyone who votes no in the survey is a bigot!

Still think redefining marriage will have no impact on freedoms and education?

It’s okay to vote no!

 

Authorised D. van Gend, Australian Marriage Forum Inc., 5b Jaybel St, Salisbury Q4107

Share Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube

19 Responses

  1. ISIS need not worry about destroying us, we are doing the job for them ourselves. As those behind the Iron Curtain brought about their own collapse so will the barbaric behaviour of those described here and the stupidity of those in the media, politics, corporate world and others who tacitly condone this by their own silence or behavior.

  2. The behaviour of these young gay activist men and women is an utter disgrace and a cause for genuine concern about the direction Australia is going as a society. Presumably many of these foul-mouthed, vindictive louts are university students – funded by the Australian tax payer. Congratulations to the young Catholic students for their great restraint, courage and witness to true Australian values. They are the hope for Australia, not the rabble or the complacent but culpable politicians, corporations, media and uninformed pubic who tacitly encourzge this behaviour by their actions, speech or, at best, their silence.

    • Unfortunately Gordon when your comment reflects a level of disrespect and naming…this to can be regarded as bullying. University students pay fees and picking out certain groups of people as “Good” and others as “Bad” does not give a balanced approach in this campaign. The ABC program God Forbid shone a healthy light on both aspects of this survey!!! It is a survey…not a life or death matter. The politicans will decide in the long run.

  3. The Red Front & SSM Reactionaries are always striving to defeat the best interests of the Australian people. We must all be aware of their agenda and fight back!

  4. The article below can be found on the internet searching the name Michael Swift: Gay Revolutionary which originally was published in the US Gay Community News.

    Michael Swift: “Gay Revolutionary”
    From Gay Community News

    We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

    Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

    If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

    We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

    Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

    We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your mayors, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

    There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

    We shall raise vast private armies to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honour are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

    The family unit will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

    All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

    The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.\

    “We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

    “We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

    Tremble, heterosexual pig, when we appear before you without our masks.

    • Arthur i can fully understand your horror and disgust at the above if you have been led to believe it is genuine.

      But it is satire, long exposed as such.

      We may well regard it as satire in very bad taste.

      But it is satire none the less.

      • Margaret,

        You claim this written work by Michael Swift was satire but there was a recent court case in a Sydney where the judge jailed a teacher for sodomising a male student and having sexual intercourse with 2 female students. This teacher never apologised for his sexual behaviour towards his students because he believed “love is love.” The LGBTIAQ party dictators strongly believe people should be able to marry whoever they love and people can’t help who they fall in love with. There is no need to control feelings, desires, passions and lusts expect this comes in direct conflict with both nursing and teaching regulations which make it unprofessional conduct for a registered nurse or teacher to have an adult or mature minor consenting sexual relationship with a patient/student let alone call this a marriage. If the LGBTIAQ party dictators can change the word “marriage” for their own sexual behaviour and lifestyle then there will be nothing to stop the next party dictator from changing the professional code of conduct for both nursing and teaching so registered nurses and teachers can love without restrictions. The idea that “marriage is between any 2 people” is a satire because the word “people” include children, parents, siblings, more than a couple, nurses, patients, teachers and students etc. I wish Michael Swift’s article was only satire because some recent court cases involving sodomy describe the physical and emotional harm to the victims but the judge is trying to determine if this sexual harm was consensual. The government has only accepted a certain group of people who identify as same-sex partners because the community will most likely accept this form of homosexuality. However, I have asked teachers about the homosexuality I experienced at school as a child/teenager and they tell me they would be calling the police because this is sexual assault. This is really no different to the Victorian governments plan with legal assisted dying practice because the government is only identifying a certain group of people who they believe the community will accept to gain access to legal assisted suicide practice. This legal assisted dying practice isn’t based on patient’s level of suffering pain as pregnant women in labour are easily identified but our society would never accept this group even if their pregnancy was terminal for both mother and neonate such as placenta previa. The government and media are trying to find the best examples of same-sex relationships, abortion and sex workers in order for society to change its moral practice on legal sodomy, legal abortion and legal prostitution. The government believes a more inclusive society will accept everyone’s lifestyle but I doubt very much that the government and parents would want the homosexuality I experienced nor the swearing, stealing, porn and drug culture I grew up in.

        • Michael

          Arthur, Margaret, Janine,
          This whole LGBTIQ thing is one big satire, right from the word ‘gay’. A satire mocks reality, while cynically revealing the truth. The political satire Yes Prime Minister continues to be bought, read and watched, because it reflects the truth of things. Michael Swift’s piece is simply a more explicit version of the already normalised LGBTIQ satirical use of the words ‘gay’, ‘diversity’, ‘inclusion’, etc.

          Diversity becomes satire, because LGBTIQ diversity means conformity to their dictates. Inclusion becomes satire, because LGBTIQ inclusion means excluding the opposite sex. Sexual activity becomes satire, for uniting genitals with digestive organs mocks their design and purpose. Men don’t have vaginas. Sodomy becomes a satire, a black comedy, a bloodsport (literally).

          Parliament thinks it can change the meaning of the word ‘marriage’ to include (some) same-sex couples, because it has already changed the meaning of the word ‘people’ to exclude unborn people. Yet state parliaments have been able to blur the distinction between adults and children, because the word ‘people’ includes both in its meaning. In Tasmania, a 12-year-old girl can legally obtain an abortion without the parental knowledge or consent that would be required for any other legal medical procedure.

          If love is love, why can’t this 12-year-old girl marry her best friend? It’s normal for children and teenagers to have close friends of the same sex. The LGBTIQ dictators want the word ‘marriage’ so they can have greater access to young people, to encourage them to sexualise these innocent friendships, when they are still too young to realise they’re being manipulated by much older adults with ulterior motives. With the word ‘marriage’ in hand, the LGBTIQ party will be better able to capture the idealism of youth, and corrupt the innocence of childhood. This is the message of Swift’s satire.

          If parliament can redefine ‘person’ for the purpose of abortion law, it can redefine ‘person’ for marriage law too. If a real person can be a legal non-person, then a non-person can be made a legal person. My widowed uncle has a terminally-ill rescue dog as his constant companion. It sleeps in his bed, in my aunty’s old spot. Uncle’s doggy fulfills the role of a spouse, friend, companion, helpmate, and soulmate. Marriage equality, anyone? Surely a progressive and inclusive society must stamp out discrimination between humans and non-humans, extending “marriage equality” to our furry friends.

          Many married Australians remove the ability of marital relations to procreate new life, so a civil marriage need not be to a living thing. Many who haven’t experienced a genuine one-flesh marriage find what they imagine to be greater satisfaction by artificial means. Some couples make these an equal participant in their relations, thus extending marriage equality to robotic orthotic intimate inanimates.

          If civil marriage has been reduced to the equivalent of a cat/dog registration celebrated with a wedding ceremony, then a man can celebrate his car registration with a wedding ceremony, and have that recorded as a civil marriage. Many times has a grown man kissed the bonnet of that special car with which he has a life-long, loving and committed relationship.

          Children love their favourite dollies and teddy bears, often becoming very distraught if they go missing. If an adult can express love by marrying a motor car or a “marital aid”, then children can express love by marrying their dollies and teddy bears. If adults and children are equally “2 people”, so are their respective toys.

          • Michael,

            Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, the slippery slope is so real that the word “marriage” will be used by “cuffers.”

  5. I’m voting NO to protect my offspring. This sht happened in Canada and kindy kids are taught Homosexuality directly because of it.

  6. Michael

    LGBTIQ marriage equality ‘yes’ activists are so full of love. I set up a double-sided sign made from two solid-core doors bolted together with half-inch steel angle, bolted to a flat tray ute, like this /\, and parked it in a highly visible location on the highway. Each side says:–

    Marriage = Man + Woman

    It has been continually defaced by LGBTIQ marriage equality Yes campaigners, for example:–

    * In a pre-meditated act of vandalism, a lesbian activist and two teenagers brought ready-made additions reading “Wo”, and stuck them in front of the word ‘Man’.

    * Two male LGBTIQ Yes campaigners taped over the letters “Wo” of the word ‘Woman’.

    * A group of LGBTIQ male youths from a sporting team bus which stopped so they could urinate together behind the bus shed, used black spray paint to obliterate the “Wo” of ‘Woman’, while repeatedly screaming vile obscenities.

    These were all witnessed by passing traffic.

    When LGBTIQ Yes campaigners saw our determination to repair the sign, their attacks turned to the vehicle. An LGBTIQ Yes campaigner deflated all four tyres, and appeared to remove some wheel balancing weights, and attempted to interfere with the doorlocks, so the key wouldn’t fit. He thought no-one saw him, until he had a little visit from the police.

    We removed the vehicle, leaving the sign on display. Yes campaigners kept on tipping it over. The last time I righted the sign, I wrote a little message on the wrong side, for the next LGBTIQ Yes campaigner who turned it over. When they realised we would set it upright almost immediately, these cowards waited until nightfall, and stole it under the cover of darkness. Two solid-core doors bolted together can’t blow away in the breeze.

    I thank God that this happens — they show what they want to do to Australia, by what they do to this sign. The LGBTIQ Yes party wants to turn men into women; turn women into men; and overturn the meaning of marriage. When I was inflating the tyres, passing Yes motorists made obscene gestures at me, which so eloquently shows what the LGBTIQ party is all about.

    Here are some photos of the marriage sign vandalised by LGBTIQ Yes campaigners. The love of the “love is love” activists has nothing to do with love.

    • Michael

      Thanks to everyone who’s had a look at the photos. As an update, a representative of the sporting team has apologised for their unacceptable behaviour, but continues to deny defacing the sign, despite there being three adult eye witnesses who were unseen by the participants.

      • Michael

        Update: good coverage in this week’s local newspapers. One local paper used a picture of my vandalised sign to illustrate an article on “marriage equality” in the local area. The article started with quotes from a pro-LGBTIQ state MP, and finished with quotes from the female pro-LGBTIQ commissioner appointed by the state government to replace our local council. But the middle third of the article was about my sign, and quoted me just as much as the other two. They even used my quote, “The love of the “love is love” camp is no love at all.”

        Plus, this week’s edition also printed my letter to the editor, saying that marriage is a consummated union of two complimentary opposites forming a self-sufficient whole, for example, key and lock, plug and socket, cup and saucer, frame and picture. They even printed “No-one hangs two empty picture frames on a wall and calls it ‘art equality’.”

        The other local weekly printed a short letter about my sign, ending with, “This is Australia, not North Korea. People who don’t like my sign should put up their own, instead of vandalising and stealing other people’s property.”

        Lastly, the sporting club’s vice president has now emailed, “While we sincerely apologise that the sign was vandalised, please do not hold the club accountable”. So I replied, setting out everything we witnessed, and said that they wouldn’t feel the need to apologise if they had nothing to do with it.

        • Michael,

          Thanks for your news as Australians need to see the real reason for the NO CAMPAIGN is against falsification of western society with persons who have paper birth, paper marriage, paper family. Plus, Australians need to understand the harm with identifying themselves in the mastermind of psychology/psychiatry with words such as homosexual, heterosexual, transgender, cisgender, bisexual, queer, asexual, intersex etc.

  7. Hi

    i will be voting no because marriage is between a man and women. Marriage equality is when a man can ask a women or a women can ask a man to marry, we already have marriage equality, that is men and women have equal rights. i am really fed up with the LGBT going on about marriage equality because they want same sex marriage which is not marriage equality. I have been married for 20 years and have 3 children. i have no issues with same sex couples having a relationship, commitment ceremony or partnership. For gay couples to say there relationship is the same as heterosexual couples is just a lie, it is clearly not and will never be. i do not want my traditional married relationship to be confused, devalued or debased in any way with any other type of relationship. i will be very disappointed if this survey has a majority yes vote because people do not understand whats at stake.

    i do not want the Gender Fairy by “Jo Hirst” to be part of the school program because it is not OK to teach that rubbish in school. The majority of children are heterosexual who have a mother and father, they might also may have siblings and extended family like grandparents. Gay same sex couples can not have children (naturally), they should not dictate to parents who can and do, that there children should receive same sex educations such as the “Gender fairy”.
    if you have not already voted, then please vote NO
    Thank you
    Michael

  8. Hi,

    Just wondering if people who have voted ‘Yes’ can contact the AEC and have their initial vote voided, and then re-vote ‘No’?

    I have voted ‘No’, but after what happened to Tony Abbott there may be thousands of Australians who voted ‘Yes’ who want to reverse their votes.

    Cheers.

  9. I care more about freedom of speech than whether the gay lobby (who already enjoy all the rights of hetero couples) can force the community to “marry” them. This neo fascist and intolerant behaviour is un-Australian and anyone that defends it will no doubt be judged by future generations who will lose their right to have a different view – which democracy is supposed to be based on.

  10. Gay people are being imprisoned and executed around the world and you are complaining about having your posters torn up? How pathetic. I remember when homosexuals were beaten up by large groups of cowardly male “poofter bashers” and could do so without any fears of being arrested by police. In fact, it was still a crime to be a homosexual when I was growing up. You should be ashamed to worry about your “freedoms” (really, we should be calling them “privileges”) in the face of such history. Imagine being terrified to lose your job if anyone found out you were homosexual
    .
    You want the “freedom” to be a homophobic bigot and want protection from people’s anger at your bigoted actions….be ashamed..

    • Michael

      Zeke,
      Christians are being imprisoned and executed around the world and you are complaining about “homophobic bigotry”? How pathetic. LGBTIQ dictators tell us people are born gay, but won’t lift a finger to prevent unborn “gay” babies from being torn apart without anaesthetic by legal abortion.

      If you have specific crimes you recall, go to the police, as all state police forces now have “Gay and Lesbian Liaison” officers. Gay victims of crime use their sexuality as a get-out-of-gaol-free card, because their self-identification as ‘gay’ is always taken as the motivation for the crime, even when it has nothing to do with it. Imagine being terrified to lose your job if anyone found out you believed that only a man and a woman can be married.

      You want the “freedom” to be an LGBTIQ bigot and want the protection of anti-discrimination law from normal people’s calm response to your bigoted actions….be ashamed.

Leave a comment