Another example of the many and varied ways for the homosexual 'normal' to be enforced: not long back, the Mozilla boss sacked for daring to donate to the defence of marriage in California (Proposition 8); likewise sundry bakers, photographers and florists prosecuted for declining to give the work of their hands to homosexual 'weddings'; and now Chase bank profiling its employees for suitably pro-homosexual views.
All this because of the 'niceness' of society in not wanting to say "Enough: homosexual couples are free to live as they choose, but they cannot force on us their judgement that the sexual acts of two males are as natural, normal and right as the relationship of man and woman in marriage". Niceness is being stomped underfoot by the new gay intolerance - is that because tolerance is not the goal, but submission?
A JP Morgan Chase bank employee says he’s not only puzzled by an internal company survey that asked workers if they considered themselves friend of the lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender community — he’s fearful of losing his job.
The unnamed employee reported to Professor Robert George of Princeton, who runs a law blog, that this year’s company survey — which is distributed to employees annually as a means of gauging work satisfaction — asked respondents to note if they were disabled, had children or spouses and domestic spouses with disabilities and were members of the LGBT community, Breitbart reported.
But the last question was the most controversial. It read, Breitbart reported: “Are you … an ally of the LGBT community, but not personally identifying as LGBT?”
The employee said he feared that answering no could open him up to charges of discrimination that could negatively impact his employment.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/3/chase-bank-surveys-workers-see-if-theyre-ally-lgbt/#ixzz36q8gze9mShare