The Hon Kevin Andrews on gay marriage implying group marriage

He is correct: once we destroy the objective meaning of marriage (being essentially a social reinforcement of the natural phenomenon of male + female = offspring) and reduce it to an institution of adult narcissism, nothing other than 'superstition' can stop three loving adults, deeply committed to each other, demanding their right to 'marriage equality'.

Read this report by Michelle Grattan on the new book by Mr Andrews, HERE:

FEDERAL opposition spokesman on families Kevin Andrews has warned that  legalising same-sex marriage could lead to an acceptance of group marriage.

In his book Maybe 'I do': Modern marriage and the pursuit of  happiness, out today, Mr Andrews also says that the assertion that  redefining marriage will not affect other marriages is misplaced.

He writes that if same-sex unions are recognised by civil law, ''other  arrangements can also be recognised. Once the state can no longer insist that  marriage involves a commitment to a member of the opposite sex, there is no  ground (other than superstition) for insisting that marriage be limited to one  person rather than several.''

Mr Andrews believes a consequence of defining marriage more widely would be  greater state intrusion into family life. ''The state will be called upon also  to create the social conditions to protect such unions. If the state can define  marriage as something  new and novel, it can define other arrangements. It can  'educate' people to accept this new arrangement, as has occurred in a series of  cases in Canada.

''Freedoms, including religious freedom, subsequently come under attack. Even  the understandings of 'mother' and 'father' are replaced by 'parent 1' and  'parent 2' or some similar language …

''Redefining marriage 'politicises' the institution in a dangerous manner,''  he writes.

 

Share Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube

Comments are closed.