A senior British QC has analysed the legal impact on individuals (parents in particular) and institutions (schools, churches, businesses) of legalising homosexual marriage. As AMF has warned, legalising gay marriage means, above all, normalising homosexual behaviour in the wider culture, and the full force of anti-discrimination law will be used to crush conscientious objection to homosexual behaviour by any parent, church or other individual and group.
That, after all, is the big cultural prize that the gay lobby hopes for from 'gay marriage': not the vanishingly tiny number of gays who actually want to take on the restrictive, bourgeois, non-sexually- exuberant lifestyle 'to the exclusion of all others voluntarily entered into for life'... With gay marriage the sixties' sexual revolution will be complete (short of a few further adventures into polyamory and other as-yet unimagined permutations).
As this article in the Telegraph outlines, homosexual marriage means compusory homosexualisation of the school curriculum - and if parents object, too bed. And if teachers object, best find another job. As the Telegraph reports HERE:
...Aidan O’Neill, a senior QC and expert on religious freedom and human rights, also warned that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their child from lessons.
In a report, he said that any decision to redefine marriage would have far-reaching consequences for schools, hospitals, foster carers and public buildings.
The most serious impact is likely to be felt in the church where vicars and priests conducting religious marriage ceremonies could be taken to court for refusing to carry out a gay wedding, he said...