Gay ‘Marriage’ Guarantees Gay Sex Education

Don't forget: gay 'marriage' guarantees gay sex-education and parents will have no say.

Right now parents can push back - with some success - against the radical LGBT 'Safe Schools' agenda, but once the law says that homosexual 'marriage' is normal and right, schools MUST teach that homosexual behaviour is normal and right. There is no logical way out, and parents will just have to wear it.

Marxist ideologue Roz Ward, co-author of Safe Schools, makes clear the two stand and fall together:

'Anti-bullying head links Safe Schools to same-sex marriage"
• THE AUSTRALIAN, MARCH 10

One of the key architects of the Safe Schools Coalition made a speech at a gay marriage rally claiming the anti-bullying program was being undermined by “state-sponsored homophobia” that prevented gay and transgender people from marrying.

La Trobe University academic Roz Ward, who co-developed Safe Schools and manages the program in Victoria, linked the schools program to the politically contested issue of same-sex marriage in May 2013.

At the time of Ms Ward’s speech, prime minister Julia Gillard and opposition leader Tony Abbott were both against broadening the criteria of marriage. The Safe Schools program was running in 100 schools.

“It is a total contradiction to say we want (the) Safe Schools ¬Coalition but you can’t get married to the person that you love,” Ms Ward told a rally in Melbourne. “(Teachers) have to work in this context where we have this state-sponsored homophobia in this discriminatory law and still fight against homophobia.

“The question of equal marriage is important in every single school that I go to, because I talk to teachers and they say to me: ‘How can we continue to fight against homophobia when the students will say to us that same-sex couples or transgender people cannot get married to the people they love? The law says it’s not equal and then we need to turn around as teachers and say: well it should be but it’s not’.”

The Safe Schools Coalition is ostensibly an apolitical anti-bullying program designed to promote acceptance and understanding of children dealing with questions of sexuality and gender.

Parts of the program have come under fire from conservatives who argue that it pushes a leftist ideological agenda and transcends its pursuit to reduce bullying of gay and transgender students. It has been criticised for promo¬ting a politically correct approach to sex education, with teachers told not to refer to students as “boys and girls”, as the terms are “heterosexist”, and pupils as young as 11 encouraged to role-play as gay teenagers.

Ms Ward oversees youth-orientated projects at Gay and Lesbian Health Victoria, which gets $315,000 a year from the state government.

Railing against a “push to fit people into gender constructs that promote heterosexuality’’ at a Marxist conference in Melbourne last year, she alluded that Safe Schools was part of a broader strategy to change society.

“Programs like the Safe Schools Coalition are making some difference but we’re still a long way from liberation,’’ she said. “Marxism offers the hope and the strategy needed to create a world where human sexuality, gender and how we relate to our bodies can blossom in extraordinarily new and amazing ways that we can only try to imagine today.”

More than 500 schools have voluntarily signed up to the program, with Victoria the only state to make it mandatory in all schools except independent ones by 2018.

The federal government, which has provided $8 million in funds, has announced a review, while the Victorian opposition has called on Premier Daniel Andrews to reverse the decision to roll it out to all Victorian state secondary schools.

A Safe Schools Coalition spokesperson told The Australian yesterday that “individuals are entitled to hold their own political views’’, adding that “our focus is on ensuring that school is a safe and inclusive place for all young people’’.

Originally posted in the Australian

Share Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube

28 Responses

  1. Uh, she said the opposite to what you said she said. She said the Safe Schools Coalition is liberating LGBTI students (a good thing), but that it doesn’t go far enough, and that only Marxism can do that. In doing so, she actually said that Safe Schools is not part of Marxism. You guys need to learn to read, and not just assume that everything you find controversial can be twisted to fit your argument.

    • So – not only is Nick pushing for same sex marriage, he is also supportive of a program which will force children who are a long way off puberty to hear about people who take hormones and have their genitalia mutilated and removed, often at a young age – and without parental consent. Because if we can convince children to damage themselves at a young age and applaud them for it, society is bound to progress! These people are so lost Nick, and your identifying not only with sodomites but also with the cultural marxist view that sexuality is fluid, betrays your motives as just arguing for the sake of it, against anything the good people at the marriage alliance inform us about.

  2. You’re also wrong about the link between Safe Schools and marriage equality. She said that a ban on marriage equality perpetuates homophobia. That’s nothing like saying that legal marriage equality will make Safe Schools mandatory.

  3. The concepts of redefining marriage and the Safe Schools push are linked. The article heading accurately captures what’s being said repeatedly throughout the the article’s content. The link could not be clearer.

    We are talking about a broad revolutionary front that we don’t need and thankfully we are waking up to – just in time.

    • One does not make the other mandatory.

  4. From Canadian gay activist Robin Perelle in 2011:

    “There is a moral and ethical question in all of this,” retired teacher Ben Seebaran said on Simpson’s radio show. “Society has evolved in such a way that those who do not subscribe to the view that gay marriages or differences in sexual orientations are quite acceptable, are made to feel less of a human being.”

    This is a moral question, I agree. Just as the black civil rights movement changed the rules of what is and isn’t acceptable for racism, the gay rights movement is shifting norms in Canada. And with that comes a message to those who won’t evolve: your outdated morals are no longer acceptable, and we will teach your kids the new norms.”

    http://www.m.dailyxtra.com/node/4685

    The ideology is the same and it now seeks to claim Australia, and it will if we let it. See how targeting children and the redefinition of marriage are linked. The goal is to remake society, so it’s natural to make for the kids…

    …if we let them.

  5. Marriage is the public, life-long commitment to the behavioural practice of sexual intercourse, excluding all others for the benefit of children. Sex education teaches children that sexual intercourse can only happen between one man and one woman which can reproduce a natural, biological child. However, the LGBTIAQ lobby are demanding marriage (sexual intercourse) for themselves so they can rationalise their sexual activities of sodomy as the same as sexual intercourse to be taught as acceptable, natural, normal, moral and usual sexual behaviours. The government believes it can expand the definition of marriage (sexual intercourse) to include sexual activities of sodomy which only same-sex couples can practice. The Safe School (coalition) program is being used by schools to re-enforce the acceptance of sexual activities of sodomy, and children/teenagers are bullied as “bigots,” “homophobes,” “prejudice,” and “hate speech” if they don’t embrace these sexual activities for themselves or encourage or promote these sexual behaviours. If marriage (sexual intercourse) is changed to mean sexual activities of sodomy then the education department is forced to teach children/teenagers anal and oral sex, mind sex and masturbation as sexual intercourse. When children and teenagers learn sexual activities is sexual intercourse this is going to impact negatively on healthcare professionals and services whom practice legal, professional sexual activities on patients for diagnosis, treatment, health and wellbeing. People will feel raped by having a vaginal or rectal examinations because they will feel this is similar to what they have been taught as sexual intercourse as it includes sexual activities. It may become hard to attract people to become nurses and doctors when people don’t understand the difference between sexual intercourse, sexual activities of sodomy and healthcare sexual activities with patients, including minors. I am investigating the impact the change to the Marriage Act will have on healthcare professional and services by communicating this change with legal services. Doctors and nurses are already allowed to be “legal murderers” because of abortion, which some people are demanding this scope of practice should expand to include consenting elderly, sick and disabled (mental and physical). Doctors and nurses can administer illegal drugs, but no one has yet suggested to expand this to weapons. The change to the Marriage Act will allow doctors and nurses to have a new legal right to practice legal, professional sexual intercourse with patients, including minors. The boundaries between sexual intercourse (one male and one female sexual organ will be expanded to include a sexual organ with a non-sexual organ – anus, mouth, mind, and hand). Unfortunately, people’s mind are becoming so twisted by porn that some people are having sex with animals etc. I don’t want to think about the possibility of health professionals minds becoming twisted what kinds of things could happen.

    The Age, reported on the question in the marriage plebiscite, “Do you support Australia allowing marriage between two adults regardless of their gender? I have a real problem with this question because it implies that Australia made up the definition of marriage which has been a sexual union and now we can change it into a gender union. When changing the meaning of marriage are we supporting Australia…….??? Are we supporting Australia Spirit/ God/ religion/government/society???? There are no laws in Australia or religion which require people to gender marriage. I didn’t marry my husband because of sexual orientation, this is sexuality ideology/theory. My orientation since birth has been to my girlfriends whom I have developed life-time physical, psychological, social, emotional and spiritual bonds. I married my husband because there is a religious law regarding a man should leave his parents and should unite with his wife and they will become “one flesh (sexual intercourse -marriage) and this behavioural practice can reproduce children to fill the earth. Marriage (sexual intercourse) hasn’t continuously been protected or supported by laws. The history of marriage in NSW was only recorded in the Church of England and other denominations from 1788-1856. I only have a church marriage certificate and I have changed my name. My legal marriage certificate in the NSW marriage registry office. My german forefathers had non-legal home church weddings. Laws like fornication-pre-marital sex, incest-pediphilia, bestiality, sodomy, adultery, divorce were all developed to protect and support sexual intercourse (marriage – “one flesh” for the benefit of children. These laws don’t mean anything in gender marriage because sexual intercourse which can reproduce biological children is irrelevant because same-sex couples can’t practice this sexual behaviour.

    What is the difference between a sexual union and a gender union? The sexual union known in marriage is sexual intercourse which has been blessed with biological children. This behavioural practice of sexual intercourse has existed from the beginning of time, and has been the only way to create natural, biological children. Australian culture has celebrated marriage (sexual intercourse) in a wedding ceremony of joining two families which will become one in the next generation. Biology and scientific evidence all support sexual intercourse between one man and one woman as an egg is fertilised by a sperm to create new life, a vagina and penis are complimentary sexual organs which allows reproduction to occur. A woman’s body has been designed for birth. A man’s body has been designed for strength to work and protect a woman and children. A man and woman are completely different physical, psychological, social, emotion and spiritual and yet they complement each other when they raise children together. The Australian Marriage Act protects and supports the behavioural practice of sexual intercourse between one man and one woman, excluding all others for life. It is the only law which protects and supports biological children having a legal right to their biological mother and father. There are laws which children from divorce/separation, IVF, surrogacy and adoption. My culture, religion and family history don’t require me and my family to be legally married by having gender marriage as this would be serving the gay alter god. I can divorce myself from gender marriage for the benefits of divorce for my children to be legally recognised as ours and not the state. The gender marriage and divorce hasn’t anything to do with religion so the shame with divorce doesn’t exist because our family situation doesn’t change except we’re divorced from gender marriage. Social security and taxation may become confusing as we aren’t defacto of gender marriage. Since the government has spent millions of dollars giving legal rights to same-sex couples to be treated equally as defacto couples, then I am sure they’ll have the money to work this one out this confusion between sexual and gender union as it is our human right for a man and woman to form a family.

    LGBTIAQ lobby are trying to rationalise the sexual activities of sodomy as being equal to sexual intercourse so they can normalise these sexual activities as acceptable, natural, normal, moral and usual sexual behaviours. I am unable to ignore my moral conscience, personal experience and scientific knowledge about the sexual activities of sodomy as they cause significant harmful health and relationship problems. A gender union of 2 male sex organs or 2 female sex organs don’t even have a name and isn’t the same as the sexual intercourse between a male and female sex organ. A gender union of 2 eggs or 2 sperm doesn’t have a name and isn’t the same as a fertilised egg with a sperm. A gender union with 2 mums or 2 dads isn’t the same as a child having a biological mother and father. A gender union is biological childless and requires state intervention with laws to protect children from divorce, separation, IVF/surrogacy and adoption. Australians and the western world minds are becoming so twisted by LGBTIAQ ideology as they believe accepting and supporting sexual activities of sodomy as equal to sexual intercourse will prevent suicide of LGBTIAQ people. If the same analogy was applied to a child who naturally eats dirt/soil and has become extremely sick, and the parents says, “a little bit of dirt never killed anyone.” The healthcare professional wouldn’t be saying to the parent the child should continue to eat dirt/soil to become better. I have worked as a healthcare professional in critical care areas for more than 23yr years, and it has been challenging how people will rationalise the most appalling behaviour. It is impossible to understand some professional people’s minds as they’ll refuse to take their sick child to the hospital, and will only give natural remedies. This was highlighted in the Age recently of a child dying from meningitis because parents did not believe in western medicine. I have spent a whole day with a friend/relative trying to explain the reason their child needed urgent medical attention because of their illness/disease. In the end they take you seriously when you them, “you’ll kill your child if they don’t seek help” and “the department of human services will remove your child” because they’re endangering their child’s life. People believe everyone is born with common sense. However, when emergency people are called to remove a male sex organ called a penis from a toaster then we know not everyone has common sense. Is it common sense for Japanese men to use robotic sex dolls/Dutch dolls to have a sexual relationship with them instead of sexual intercourse with women? Was it common sense for my 4 yr old to put sticky tape up her nose? I find it impossible to rationalise the sexual activities of sodomy such as anal and oral sex, mind sex and masturbation as equal or the same as sexual intercourse which can reproduce biological children. As a healthcare professional I need to tell the truth about marriage (sexual intercourse) because people’s minds are becoming twisted and they don’t know the difference between sexual intercourse, sexual activities of sodomy and healthcare sexual activities.

    • Thank you Janine, for your intelligent, moral commonsense views on this issue, it is so hard to believe that as a society we have come to this, “gender equality” is counterfeit to male/female sexual relationship, what frightens me more than anything is the consequences we will have to face if this “tsumani” is legislated….health care funding wil go to surrogacy, sexual diseases gender reasignments, to the detriment of aged care and chronic disease, carer support and disabilities, I fear for my children and grandchildren in this alien “new world”

    • I sort of agree with the basics of your long argument but I think you are getting confused. Sexual reproduction is indeed the way humans reproduce but you certainly do not need to get married to do that. Nature only says that reproduction requires a male and female. The question we have to ask is why was marriage invented, because it is an invention of humans? The reason is bleeding obvious once you think about it but nobody I have asked this has found the answer. This is staggering. The reason, of course, is that when the woman gives birth she can be pretty sure that the baby is hers (before artificial methods), but the man who has had a sexual union with that woman cannot be sure. As in other species, nature does not prevent several sexual partners and the child could be someone else. So, marriage was invented to give some assurance to the man that the baby is his. It is a commitment made between a man and a woman to be faithful i.e. not to have babies with anyone else. This is a great evolutionary step because the man will take care of the baby and pass on his inheritance, skills etc which gives a huge advantage to the next generation and has lead to the incredible evolution in humans. That is all marriage can do: ensure that the parents know their who their children are. And the children know who their parents are. If you think about it, the mother only care about her child and the man his child. It the child does not belong to both, how can you expect them to care for it with the same passion. Having children is the only purpose of life – assuming it has a purpose. Marriage between two people of the same sex is therefore absurd… if it were not for the fact that now there are all sorts of artificial means to obtain children without actually being the biological parents. You can simply buy the sperm or egg on Google: Google babies; or you can adopt them and you can have artificial insemination or surrogacy etc. that is you can buy babies or children. And so far same sex couples have used this to buy children. The problem has arisen now because surrogacy clinics in India and Thailand now refuse to provide this commercial service for unmarried couples. They are worried by moral and legal problems and this loophole to buy babies is now closed to homosexual couples. The question then is should we allow them to get a marriage certificate – which is meaningless – so that they can buy babies overseas? I believe that it would be criminal to vote in favor of so-called “same sex marriage”, which has the only benefit of allowing this criminal behavior. Surrogacy should be criminalized in the first place: no child should be born as the result of a commercial transaction for the pleasure of adults. And second, adoption itself should only ever be considered for the benefit of children who are deprived of their natural parents through death or neglect or other misfortune, not, again, for the pleasure and luxury of adult. Foreign adoption is particularly objectionable because it removes children from their birth culture and society. It leads to many traumatic problem and in any case is always unnecessary. If those adopting parents were really doing it for the benefit of the child they would pay the money they spend on buying it to provide for it to be raised and educated in its country of origin. There is never any excuse such as the ones I have heard: there are not enough orphans in our country to satisfy the demand! It shows the hypocrisy of this criminal practice. Of course everyone wants to have a child that’s what life is for (it makes us immortal!) but if it is not your own, it is just fantasy and play acting. Get a cat or a dog or a doll but don’t ruin a child’s life to satisfy your desires.

  6. It is legal for a man to marry his 18-year-old niece and have inbred children, and legal for a woman to marry her 18-year-old nephew and have inbred children. Funny how AMF is silent about that. I thought they opposed incest, like marriages and inbreeding? So what possible objection could AMF have to a woman marrying her 18-year-old niece and a man marrying his 18-year-old nephew? Because magical ghosts oppose such marriages for reasons unknown?

  7. We need more information about these conditions of confused sexual identity and dysphoria before we enact laws to support them.

    What causes heterosexuality? It’s the natural, default state of sexual reproduction. The cause is obvious. No discussion needed.

    Now what causes homo/transexuality?
    No one seems to know, but it is a disorder of the normal, natural process. Apparently an endocrine/hormonal malfunction and/or dysfunctional upbringing.

    I submit that a possible cause might be the use of industrial endocrine disrupting chemicals in our environment which mimic oestrogen.
    Google Xenoestrogen and BPA (Bisphenal A), an endocrine disrupter used in plastics and food containers.
    It’s in our food and drinking water and everywhere else. It can cause sexual development problems.
    Of course, sexual disorders existed in the past, but there seems to be an increase in the past few decades. especially since the introduction of the contraceptive pill (which is oestrogen). Feminists support this emasculation of men. They love the gays. Not because of their new sexual freedom, but because of an overdose of oestrogen affecting the brain… both men and women. All of us even,… possibly. How can we make an informed decision when we’re all over exposed to endocrine disrupting hormones?!

    Let us come to an agreement on the cause before we say this is normal.

    Suppose, ( and it is possible) that these conditions are caused by environmental contaminants and hormonal imbalances… Is it right to suggest that this gayness, and feelings of being in the wrong body are now normal?
    That’s a case of dealing with the symptoms of the social disorder and environmental and moral pollution, for the sake of a minority’s feeling of alienation (which is understandable because it is abnormal), – instead of addressing the cause.
    They want to make this dysfunction the new norm?!
    Gays will always feel alienated from the norm, no matter how the legislation tries to comfort them.

    I feel sorry for people who say they were born in the wrong body or have a sexual attraction to the same sex.
    But let’s ask why, instead of pretending it is all normal.

    I feel sorrier for the children who HAVE to deal with dysfunctional parents, … (regardless of any gender confusion or orientation or identification).

    One of the gay marriage lobby arguements is that gay marriage will protect their children from bullying!
    That is dealing with the symptom, not the cause.

    Safe schools seems to be educating or indoctrinating the children who will then try to convince their parents.

    Children educating their parents on sexuality. Not the other way around. lol
    Ya gotta laugh.

  8. Richard, What has your question got to do with the LGBTIAQ demand to expand marriage (sexual intercourse) to include sexual activities of sodomy which only same-sex couples can practice. You have to provide a logical and rational argument for the reasons men and women should accept these sexual activities ( anal and oral sex, mind sex (pornography/ on-line pornographic movies) chem-sex and masturbation) to be equal with sexual intercourse to be called marriage. These days people rationalise deaths of neonates based on the mother/family not wanting the baby. People are rationalising death of the consenting elderly, sick and disabled (mental and physical) because of fear of suffering pain and lack of control over death. Why should any man-woman couple get gender marriage when sexual intercourse which reproduces biological children is irrelevant because same-sex couples can’t practice this sexual behaviour? There is no civil or religious law requiring people to get gender married. Same-sex couples demand gender marriage (sexual orientation) for themselves and this is irrelevant for man-woman couples. It is impossible to create a one size marriage for both same-sex and man-woman couples because the nature, sex, gender, relationship and creation of children and family which makes society are all different. The demand of some LGBTIAQ people to create a new gender marriage which all men and women must accept and normalise is as impossible. No government would demand men and women to be equal and the same in nature, sex, gender, relationship, reproducing children to make a family. There are reasons there is no scientific report, medical or nursing textbook which encourages and promotes the sexual activities of sodomy as a form of contraception. The reasons doctors, nurses, teachers and parents have never encouraged or promoted the sexual activities of sodomy is because they cause significant harmful health and relationship problems.

    I have worked for over 23yrs as a healthcare professional in critical care areas, and it is obvious that some people’s minds are becoming twisted with porn so they should be told the truth about sexual behaviour between one man and one woman. A male sexual organ called a penis when placed into a vagina this is called sexual intercourse. Sperm travels to an egg/s – fertilisation takes place in a fallopian tube. The embryo implants into the lining of the uterus and a baby is delivered at about 40wks gestation. Nature has allowed a baby to be born having both a biological mother and father. Culture has protected and supported children having a right to live with both their mother and father. Same-sex couples have to pretend this biological sexual nature doesn’t exist because their sexual feelings, desire, lust and passion make natural, biological children an impossible reality. When a non-sexual organ such as an anus, mouth, mind or hand is used against its function this causes abuse, harm, pain and significant health and relationship problems. A person suffering from faecal incontinence after practicing anal sexual activity with a consenting partner will often try to rationalises their behaviour as good (sexual intercourse) or love, but will be conflicted with anal pain. Higher risk of anal fistulas and cancers, self-loathing, self-harm and suicide, STDs/HPV/AIDS/HIV, infertility and shorten life-span. There are a higher risk of domestic violence in same-sex relationships. Marriage isn’t a church whom all can belong. Marriage is a public, life-long commitment to a sexual union called sexual intercourse between one man and one woman, excluding others for the benefit of children. This is the reason for wearing a wedding ring everyday to tell men/women your unavailable to develop a sexual relationship with them. When partners have affairs or the marriage is sexless this breaks the sexual intercourse (marriage) between the couple and often people divorce. Therefore, it is impossible for same-sex couples to identify with this behavioural practice of sexual intercourse (marriage) which has existed since the beginning of time. Laws, religion, history, nature, biology, scientific research and culture has supported and protected marriage (“one flesh -sexual intercourse) for the benefit of spouse and children (family). I am unable to pretend sexual activities of sodomy is the same as sexual intercourse (marriage). I have to deny the truth of my moral conscience, biological/scientific knowledge and personal experience. People whom are unable to respect the behavioural practice of marriage (“one flesh” – sexual intercourse between one man and woman) have a different mind-set. The Guardian highlighted today – the global threat of drug-resistant antibiotics means more people are going to die of infections, diseases, STDs (particularly gonorrhoea) if people don’t change their sexual activities/practices and or new drugs aren’t developed. Governments shouldn’t be encouraging or promoting sexual activities which cause significant health and relationship problems. It might be natural for some children to eat dirt. People say, “A little bit of dirt hasn’t killed anyone.” However, I don’t encourage or promote children to do this behaviour because it causes significant health problems including shorten life-span when treatment fails.

  9. Hitler held to a philosophy that if you are going to lie….lie big!
    If Roz Ward has been quoted accurately she is a proponent of the same philosophy.
    The logic is astounding!
    “It is a total contradiction to say we want the Safe Schools Coalition but you can’t get married to the person you love.”
    Now think of the child and apply the same logic and we jump straight from PC ‘nice’ to socially sinister;

    It is a total contradiction to say we want the Safe Schools Coalition but you can’t be raised by the woman who conceived you and carries your biological identity and is the door to your cultural ancestry.
    Ditto in relation to being raised by your father.

    With a mind to Marxism it would appear that ‘equal’ for the LGBT activists is more than the equal our children’s rights demand.

    • You guys throw out so many baseless assumptions. Why is it a contradiction?

    • Tony you are right! My german relative killed jews when the Nazi’s controlled Germany, the german people had learnt to tolerate death whilst Hilter was in power, but my german relative was executed after World War 2 when the german society judged this behaviour as immoral. The german people in the Lutheran church could identify people with Nazi ideology by their mind-set of behaviours, ideas, beliefs and values. People tried to blame the church (Christianity) for the Nazi’s rising to power, but the Nazi’s used the church to gain power. This is similar in the ways some LGBTIAQ people want to change marriage, education, health, church, laws, welfare etc for themselves. The LGBTIAQ lobby group is using the church to gain acceptance of gender marriage for everyone. However, the church will need to re-write the Bible in order to accept and support gender marriage. Science will have to re-written for medicine and nursing to accept transgender behaviour and support sexual activities of sodomy as the same as sexual intercourse etc. Sex education will need to be re-written to support sexual activities of sodomy and transgender. The Marriage Act and divorce law will need to change to accept and support gender marriage. I have had an experience as a child/teenager of the LGBTIAQ mind-set which I could blame on domestic violence, child on child sex abuse, sexual assault/harassment, porn and being brought up in a very immoral environment. The Nazis and ISIS were once a minority group prior to gaining power which have/had affected everyone’s way of life including people from Australia having to go and fight in both of these wars. The sexual activities of sodomy is a weapon of illness/disease (death from a different kind of war as it is a silent attack on the mind, health and wellbeing). The sexual activity of sodomy (death) pretends to be the same as sexual intercourse (life) but it is infertile (death). The Guardian reported yesterday of the real threat of drug-resistant STDs (gonorrhoea) in Northern England and in the heterosexual community. Gonorrhoea is mainly prevalent in the homosexual community in Australia, but this will change if a significant amount of male-female couples start practicing sexual activities of sodomy because of the Safe School program. The Guardian reported today on the significant STD problem in Northern Queensland because of child sexual abuse. I have worked as a healthcare professional with people whom have a mind-set of death – suicidal thoughts, self-harm and self-loathing. A minority group of people believe they have a right to death – abortion when they don’t want a baby and or don’t want to suffer pain, illness, disability (mental/physical) and disease by accessing illegal drugs. These people want nurses and doctors to carry out death duties. It is impossible to make a society equal death and life as these aren’t the same. The life-style homosexual couples want for themselves isn’t the same as man-woman couples. Australians need to stand against gender marriage for everyone because this is meaningless All the laws including incest, pedophilia, bestiality, adultery, pre-marital sex, sodomy, bigamy, polygamy and divorce which protected sexual intercourse aren’t relevant to gender marriage because marriage will no longer be a sexual union.

  10. Nick hi.
    Not sure what you are asking. Ms Ward is quoted stating it is a contradiction to want a SSC but not allow SSM.
    Therefore the inference being that a school based anti-bullying programme will appropriately include LGBT propaganda as it currently does. Her further clarification stating (the lie) that to omit this (LGBT) material is “State sponsored homophobia.” ( Evidence the logic….a school based anti-bullying programme that teaches respect for self and all others by omission of LGBT sponsored material is homophobic…….simply incomprehensible!)
    There is no need for our education experts to be letting the LGBT activists anywhere near a school based anti- bullying programme…(nor any other special interest group.) If those responsible for the current LGBT hijacked SSC programme have the slightest interest in real social equality, (as opposed to promoting a genderless society), the priority special interest group to be granted access to an anti bullying programme (which should not happen because it is not the appropriate context) would be our Indigenous community. It is currently experiencing a youth suicide rate four times that of the non Indigenous community. The Kimberley alone has had over a dozen under 25s take their own lives since December.

    • “It is a total contradiction to say we want the Safe Schools Coalition but you can’t be raised by the woman who conceived you and carries your biological identity and is the door to your cultural ancestry.”

      What the hell does Safe Schools have to do with adoption/surrogacy/IVF laws?

      You said that indigenous people should get focus from the government. I absolutely agree. But they do, while Safe Schools gets only $8 million. Also, the awful plight of indigenous people is not due to bullying.

  11. THE ANTIDEPRESSANT RACKET

    In reply to Tony – Indigenous people, especially on reservations, are being given antidepressants like candy. Do some research and you will see the clear link between antidepressant usage and suicide. Suicide numbers in all of society have skyrocketed since the SSRI class of antidepressants started to be MARKETED about 25 years ago.

    This is an important topic, similar to the ‘Gay Marriage’ topic. The two are similar in that both antidepressant usage and gay marriage are being promoted via a ‘social engineering’ agenda, along with the pushing of political correctness on these topics and the lobbying of politicians. And they are similar in that both lead to a damaging and weakening of society, at least in the opinion of this website (and me) on the gay marriage topic. The main difference is that the promotion of antidepressants obviously results in the pharmaceutical industry making billions of dollars per year from this agenda, while the gay agenda seems to have little financial motive.

    There’s a whole “depression industry” making money from this agenda and it has strong political backing. See here – http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/former-prime-minister-julia-gillard-joins-beyondblue-board-20141218-129xyt.html

  12. SOCIAL ENGINEERING

    (continuing my previous post)

    For the past few years we have been subjected to several different social engineering agendas. The question is, are they linked? I believe they are. In other words, I believe the same individuals at the top of society’s power pyramid are the source of all of these several different agendas.

    In addition to the “depression industry” and the promotion of homosexuality, we also have the fake “war on terror” which is really a war against Islam (not just “radical Islam”) and which also has the financial motive of wars (which make a lot of money) in order to seize control of Central Asian & Middle Eastern oil and gas resources.

    Then there is the “man-made climate change” movement, which is, in my opinion, based on scientific fraud. This is being heavily promoted, of course, with financial incentives for many people being used as a tool to add impetus to the promotion of the agenda.

    We often see the same groups and activists promoting all four of these agendas, or at least three of the four. But these groups and individuals are just the willing dupes, not the originators of these agendas. By “going down the rabbit hole”, it is possible to see that all four of these agendas have their source in those individuals who are our real “rulers” and who, in fact, control the political leaders and our media.

    Why are they doing it? Two reasons – increased social and political control which results from the weakening of society and which will ensure that our “rulers” maintain and strengthen their positions of power; and of course, the financial benefits that come from the promotion of the three agendas other than the gay agenda.

    Sorry to stray off the topic of gay marriage. But I think it’s important to see the forest, not just one tree in the forest.

  13. Nick I posed Ms Wards (and the activist LGBT) thinking but from a perspective of a child’s right; being put before the rights of adults who possess or choose an abnormal sexual orientation and you immediately picked up on the stupidity inherint and responded with a most appropriate question. What the hell……indeed!
    What the hell does an anti-bullying programme have to do with SSM?
    What the hell does a Safe School anti-bullying programme have to do with having 11 yr olds imaging what it would be like to be in a gay relationship?
    What the hell does a school based programme that should be about self respect and respect of others have to do with the overt promotion of abnormal sexual behaviour?
    The Gay community comprises about 3% of the population. Bullying is a problem experienced by children across all social divides for all manner of innocuous reasons. (The inherint problem usually residing more with the bully than with the victim). So what the hell are the education authorities responsible for this programme doing allowing one special interest group, from one small section of the community, to promote their self serving solutions to their dubiously emphasised problems to the exclusion of all other groups?

    You asked what a school based anti-bullying programme has to do with adoption/ surrogacy/IVF. As I have pointed out relative to Same Sex Marriage…these issues should have nothing to do with a school based anti-bullying programme.
    However, as SSM is the ‘legal’ ticket the LGBT activists are striving to attain to gain ‘normal’ status, and as the LGBT activists already have access to the Safe Schools programme it would be most appropriate for the sake of equality and the rights of all children to have pro- child material included in the Safe Schools anti bullying material. This might for argument sake include 11year olds imagining what it would be like to be brought into existence with an exchange of money and then be denied your mother or your father!
    Nick I sincerely hope no Indigenous people read your post about their plight not being due to bullying.

    • “What the hell does a Safe School anti-bullying programme have to do with having 11 yr olds imaging what it would be like to be in a gay relationship?”

      You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view – until you climb into his skin and walk around in it. – Atticus Finch

      “What the hell does a school based programme that should be about self respect and respect of others have to do with the overt promotion of abnormal sexual behaviour?”

      I don’t where you got the idea that that’s happening.

      The education authorities might be neglecting other forms of bullying, but that’s a question for them, not Safe Schools. Safe Schools was started because schools asked for it, because they knew they needed to combat anti-LGBTI bullying.

  14. Love Atticus Nick but if his truth is good for one then it’s good for all and the curriculum is too crowded already and teachers pressed to the limit trying to maintain basic academic standards to have our children wringing their hands trying to empathise with what is like to walk in everyone else’s skin. They have enough to cope with trying to figure out how to walk in their own.
    Nick when a programme is partnered by a group like minus 18, when one of the programme designers believes the programme is helping liberation toward a new world of sexual promiscuity that is going to lead us to some more highly evolved state (like The Roman Empire maybe) one can hardly imagine the source of my comment.
    I simply don’t believe your last assertion. 15 years as a school principal….o that I could have a programme designed and implemented because I and a few colleagues asked for it.
    This SSC is part of a larger agenda Nick and I believe a very real example of …be careful what you wish for!

    • My proposal is to abolish religious education in class time and replace it with ethics classes. This would include things like tolerance, and would include the Safe Schools activities. That way, we could also focus on other forms of bullying too.

      Also, Roz Ward said the opposite to what you said she said. She said that Safe Schools doesn’t go far enough in doing what she wants to do, and only Marxism can do that. She differentiated them. She didn’t link them.

      And it’s true that schools asked for something like this. From The Age, “Why Safe Schools program must be kept”, March 12, 2016:

      “Cast your mind back to 2010, four years before the Safe Schools initiative was rolled out nationally under the federal Coalition. Victorian schools had become increasingly aware that some students were gay or gender diverse, and wanted to know how best to support them.”

      • Nick,

        I learnt at University teaching ethics to children without a moral (religious) framework is a waste of time. Teaching someone to be good for the sake of being good never works.

  15. I just want to draw attention to this, And there are many articles like this:

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/04/16/early-precocious-puberty.aspx
    In the 19th century the onset of menstruation occurred around the age of 15. Now the average age of the first period, or menarche, is around 12. The time during and before puberty is one of rapid development and change, which is why even months matter when it comes to first menstruation. Before menstruation, girls will show beginning signs of development, such as breast “budding” and growth of pubic hair.
    These signs are now becoming unsettlingly common among 7-, 8- and 9-year-old girls, to the extent that

    many health care providers, rather than labeling these children with a diagnosis that something is wrong, have simply changed the definition of what’s normal… but is it really “normal” for girls to mature at such a young age?

    There are more questions than answers in the case of precocious puberty, but what is certain is that girls are developing earlier than they have even 10, 20 or 30 years ago.
    End quote.

    Evidently, these endocrine disrupting chemicals are affecting girls bodies, however there is very little recsearch on how they affect males. Common sense says there must be an effect on the male body and brain since sex hormones do in fact influence the brain and emotions to some extent.

    And it’s the same thing with the lgbt promoters. Change the definition of ‘normal’ regardless of the cause.

    Parents are concerned about their children’s abnormal sexual development. And so they should be. Where’s the science that suggests we should accept this as the new norm? Schools ought to teach the facts and not pander to emotional lobby groups.

    Parents know all about sex. It isn’t something the LGBT and the younger generation have suddenly invented and must educate the rest of us.

    Polluted atmosphere causes polluted minds.

  16. I have had admittedly only a very quick look at several safe schools documents online and don’t really know enough to come to a completely informed conclusion either way so my “two cents” as so to speak in regards to safe schools is probably not worth that much. However from what I have seen I think that in order for the safe schools program to continue, I think some changes to some material should probably be made. I just want to say right from the start that I think it is terrific that the issue of bullying in regards to LGBTIQ students is being taken seriously. However, while it is in my very nature to give the benefit of the doubt, I simply can’t discount the notion that the safe schools program goes beyond its worthy purpose of reducing bullying and has an agenda. I try to give the benefit of the doubt but I can’t in all honesty simply discount this notion. From the little I have seen on the safe schools website, if I had children, I would be reluctant to allow them to participate in this program as it currently stands.

    In saying this, I believe there is no contradiction whatsoever for one to support the safe schools program but still be opposed to changing the definition of marriage. I also think that it is clearly and completely wrong to suggest (as Roz ward seems to be suggesting based on my interpretation of what she said in a section of this article) that opposition to same sex marriage is homophobia.

    Michael W

    • Sorry I should have started Roz Ward’s surname with a capital letter. I meant Roz Ward. Sorry no disrespect intended.

  17. I’m using a new name to avoid confusion. I was Michael commenting earlier.
    I agree with Michael W above.

    And the term homophobia is a new invention, used by the pro lobby to vilify anyone who has a different opinion.
    I believe that is bigotry.
    Reverse bigotry perhaps.

Leave a comment