Why these mums are right to be worried

This week the Coalition for Marriage launched its tv campaign, alerting parents to the little known consequences of redefining marriage.

Not surprisingly, the first commercial was met by backlash and faux outrage from SSM Activists, who claim the statements made by these mums are ‘ridiculous.’

What’s ‘ridiculous’ is that all these things are happening in Australian schools right now. Here’s what you need to know:

The opening scene of the ad features Cella White, who reveals that her son was told he could wear a dress to school if he felt like it. This brave mum has more disturbing revelations about what is being taught to students as part of the Safe Schools Coalition Program. You can see her full story here:

Although the school principal in question now denies that the directive was sent out to students, a quick look at the Safe Schools resource Minus 18 reveals that posters encouraging cross dressing are freely available to download, print and plaster around schools. Why are they pretending they're not?

The second mum reveals that programs like Safe Schools become widespread and compulsory in countries where SSM is legal.

We’re all being lead to believe that what we’re about to vote for in the postal survey is whether two people of the same sex should be allowed to marry. Wrong.

The current Marriage Amendment Bill states: “The term ‘same-sex marriage’ should be read to include a marriage of two people regardless of their sex or gender, where the union is not that of a man and a woman.”

Once Gender Theory is enshrined in Marriage Law, Gender Theory becomes compulsory in schools, and is taught as ‘fact’ from Kindergarten to University.

It’s happening right now without parents knowledge or consent in countries like the USA where SSM is legal.

“A first grader at a California charter school was sent to the principal’s office this week after she accidentally “mis-gendered” a transgender classmate in what’s being called a “pronoun mishap.”

The incident occurred at Rocklin Academy, a school rocked by controversy after a kindergarten teacher led an in-class discussion on transgenderism that included a “gender reveal” for a little boy who was transitioning to a little girl.

For kindergartners.

Parents were furious because they were not informed in advance and were not given the chance to opt-out their five-year-old's from the classroom transgender activity. However, school leaders informed moms and dads – they were not allowed to opt-out – and the state did not require them to notify parents.

The latest incident occurred during the first week of school when a first grader came across a classmate on the playground. She called the student by his given name – apparently unaware that the boy now identified as a girl.”

The third mum reveals that children in year 7 are being asked to role play being in a same sex relationship.

Teacher and mother Moira Deeming has read the Australian Safe Schools Curriculum and explains: “Page after page of lesson plans made no mention of bullying, but instead graphically fixated on – and normalised – the high-risk sex lives of fictional, seemingly emotionless teens, always categorised as LGBTI, Cis, etc. Sexually-transmitted infections were literally described as a ‘normal part of sex’, something to test for and treat, not to avoid. Discussions of domestic violence focused almost solely on male to female violence, further humiliating male victims and embedding harmful gender stereotypes. There were no caveats in the material acknowledging that gender fluidity, male privilege, and unconscious bias are disputed sociological theories, worthy of investigation and debate, but not objective, settled science.”

Victoria’s Labor Government will spend $3.4 million of taxpayers’ money on a ‘degendering program,’ claiming: “It will build the capacity of ­educators to use reflective practice to critically evaluate their work with children using anti-bias ­approaches specifically regarding gender bias.”

It’s all in a bid to target ‘sexist 4 years olds,’ eradicating ‘gender norms’ from classrooms; Encouraging little boys to wear dresses and the shame of ‘anti male sentiment’ surrounding domestic violence.

Right now, parents in Australia still have a voice to speak up about dangerous Gender Theory being taught in schools.

Following parental backlash, NSW Education Minister banned Safe Schools in NSW. Transgender Activists snuck it back into the curriculum under a different name but mothers who run the website youreteachingourchildrenwhat.org ‘outed’ their foul play and it was banned again. For now.


Parents from countries where SSM is legal have been warning us for years about what really happens after marriage is redefined. We ignore them at our peril.

Share Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Follow us Facebooktwitterrssyoutube

7 Responses

  1. But how is any of this caused by marriage? The fact that it’s happening means nothing for marriage.

    • Nick,
      Legalising “same-sex marriage” would give LGBTIQ activists greater access to school children to promote all sexual lifestyles and behaviour as equally healthy, when this is simply not true. The fanstasy of “same-sex marriage” would become a legally and culturally enforcible celebration of the “gender theory” and “sexuality” already being taught to the children of these mothers. It’s morally wrong of LGBTIQ activists to have access to taxes gained from parents who don’t believe the LGBTIQ sexuality myth, to promote this myth to their children; children the LGBTIQ activists choose to be incapable of having naturally.

  2. As a mother of 3 children at a school with the safe schools policy, I can assure you all that is being done with this policy is that our children are becoming tolerant and educated members of society. Over time I believe more and more mothers will see this, as more and more groups like christians like me have become supporters of same sex marriage. Jesus taught us to love all his children.

    • Evidently, we are not all his children. Jesus said (John cahpter 8) :

      43Why do you not understand what I am saying? It is because you are unable to accept My message. 44You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar and the father of lies. 45But because I speak the truth, you do not believe Me!…
      end quote.
      When did he ever say to be tolerant?

    • Sharron,
      If you truly love someone, you will speak the truth to them in love. Jesus taught about marriage —

      At the beginning the Creator made them male and female, and said, for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother, and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. (Matthew 19:4-5)

      Christians cannot accept “marriage equality” because it is a lie. There is no sexual activity or relationship equal to the one-flesh marriage of a man and a woman, and this symbolises and looks forward to the last and ultimate marriage of Christ and his Church, which is a union of difference, not sameness. Just as Abraham sent his servant away to bring home a bride, Rebecca, for his son Isaac, the Father has servants into the four corners of the earth to prepare a bride for his Son, Jesus Christ. This is why Jesus remained single while on earth. His cheek was kissed in betrayal; his lips were never kissed in love. He held the hands of those he healed, but he never “held hands”. The bride of Christ, the church, must remain virginal and pure, so cannot condone or support or participate in sexual perversion.

      Would you really want your son to have to wear nappies when he’s grown up? Would you really want your daughter to contract drug-resistant gonorrhoea of the throat, from boys who treated her like she’s a gay man? The respect and tolerance of Safe Schools is a trojan horse to bring the lie into the classroom, that all sexual behaviour/relationships are equally healthy. You wouldn’t teach your children that all breathing behaviours are equally healthy. Or should we encourage children of diverse respiratory orientation to come out with pride, stamp out tobaccophobia, and finally achieve breathing equality?

  3. Teo

    This is happening before legalizing SSM.
    what if it would be legalized?

Leave a comment